|
|
| 1 | The first set of considerations for all people is that
the person is physiologically stable, free from internal pain and irritation,
and lives and participates in environments that are safe, healthy, stimulating,
pleasurable and occupied by people who are caring and supportive. Intervention
and support programs should be preceded or accompanied by the achievement
of these elements. Indeed, the presence of optimal physiological and environmental
conditions can be the dominant factor in the accomplishment or facilitation
of intervention and support objectives.
|
|
2
|
Families represent the most significant resource and the
most powerful influence affecting a person's development and well-being.
Therefore, programs focused on the needs of children and adults who live
in family contexts should emphasize efforts to enhance family interactions
and the well-being of the entire family system. Furthermore, because families
are typically the most knowledgeable sources regarding the person and the
person's social and ecological context, the principal factor in determining
appropriate intervention and support programs should be informed family
choice.
|
|
3
|
Challenging behaviors (such as self-injury, aggression,
stereotypy, and tantrums) that are displayed by some people with autism
and related disabilities are addressed most successfully and humanely when
an understanding of the behavior's purpose (including its communicative
significance) is established through a process of functional assessment.
A functional assessment should precede the development and implementation
of any program designed to reduce challenging behaviors, and the program
should be based on an understanding that is derived from the assessment
process.
|
|
4
|
Programs of behavioral intervention and behavioral support
should emphasize educational, ecological and antecedent manipulations.
It is not justifiable from an ethical or technical perspective to employ
aversive procedures. Behavioral interventions and support programs should
not include practices that produce pain or tissue damage, or any immobilization
other than brief restraint that is necessary in emergency (crisis) situations
to protect the person or other people from injury. Furthermore, programs
should exclude any procedure that causes a person to be ridiculed, lose
dignity, or suffer social humiliation.
|
|
5
|
Intervention and support programs for people with autism
and related disabilities should produce educationally-relevant outcomes
and, in particular, the development of observable and functional skills
that have demonstrable value in a person's lifestyle. Intervention and
support programs should not rely upon unproven treatments that are directed
at hypothetical disease constructs or unobservable mechanisms.
|
|
6
|
Intervention and support programs should be developed on
an individualized basis and should be based on assessment data, family
input, the individual's preferences and a careful consideration of short
and long term objectives. Intervention and support programs should not
be prescribed on the basis of a diagnosis.
|
|
7
|
Intervention and support programs should be evaluated on
the basis of measurable outcomes that are meaningful from the perspective
of the person, the person's family, and the person's care and support providers.
Meaningful outcomes refer to progress that is manifested as improvement
in the way a person lives.
|
|
8
|
Social development is extremely complex, and
the capacity to interact in social contexts with competence and comfort
is an essential objective for all people. Progress in the development of
social behavior for people with autism and related disabilities requires
extensive guidance and experience. Therefore, participation in typical
social environments with typically-developing peers, and with the individualized
assistance and support necessary to achieve successful interactions, should
be a feature of comprehensive educational and support programs for people
with autism and related disabilities.
|